• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home arrow Tara's Trysts arrow Americans Have No Inherent Sexual Rights
Americans Have No Inherent Sexual Rights
Written by Tara Tainton   
Friday, 24 February 2006 23:00
...and that goes for marriage rights as well. And as it's the state that I'm eager to leave, I'm sure none of you will be surprised to learn that the lawmakers of the state of Indiana are making every effort to ensure that they're in the lead when it comes to the absolution of personal rights and freedoms.

indiana state government center indianapolis


The Indiana State Govt. Center in Indianapolis:
where the only moral citizens of the state (apparently)
meet to decide the fate of the rest of us
It's no joke, nor is it any secret. The US Midwest clings to our puritan ancestry with its sharp claws like no other part of the entire country. Why? Maybe because we're centralized, farther separated from the waters enabling international trade and the exchange of ideas and information. Everyone in and outside of this country is familiar with the jokes about the ways, intelligence, and mindset of those in Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama. Perhaps those with broader views stay clear of the Midwest due to the stereotypes while those few open minds raised here escape to other parts of the country later in their lives.

No matter the reason, the fact still stands. Indiana and the rest of the Midwest is behind the times, behind the rest of the world in realizing the rights of individuals and the multi-faceted benefits of protecting them. After all, Indiana recently flunked a report conducted by the Heartland Alliance for Human Needs and Human Rights ("Bad Marks," NUVO) grading the state's overall treatment of its own citizens. Nice. We rank 8th out of all midwestern states on the same scale used internationally.

When it comes to archaic sex laws, we all like to laugh at them. We know some US states have some pretty entertaining ones that no one has bothered to revisit and eliminate, like those deeming oral sex illegal. An Indy resident has recently been taken to court ("Taking Dominance to the Courts," NUVO) and charged with a slew of horrible sex crimes. The local dominatrix "inflicted torture and humiliation and engaged in sexual acts such as masochism and the erotic infliction of pain and humiliation." It doesn't matter that her line of work includes consensual and agreed upon physical and mental stimulation; our Indiana govt. is stating that she's somehow breaking the local zoning ordinances... none of which state anything pertaining to her case or activities.

It's evident that the state has needed to directly address the issue of sexual rights and confirm, once and for all, just which freedoms its residents should be permitted. Lawmakers recently met to do just that. The results were startling ("Sex and the Statehouse," NUVO). Instead of eliminating or rewriting obviously outdated laws infringing on personal rights, our govt. officials just confirmed their legitimacy and decided to maintain every single one of them. In short, it would be hard to prove that there's a single sexually active adult in the entire state who is not now officially determined to be a sexual deviant or can be charged with the associated crimes.

Historical and recently reconfirmed Indiana state law:

  • We're all sexually deviates and, legally, should be in jail. State law dictates, "Deviate sexual conduct means an act involving 1) a sex organ of one person and the mouth or anus of another person; or 2) the penetration of the sex organ or anus of a person by an object." In other words, we can't be personally acquainted with blow jobs, butts or batteries publicly or behind closed doors.
  • It's illegal for a man to publicly sport an erection, just as in 15 other states.
  • Absolutely no sex before marriage is permitted. "A mutually faithful monogamous relationship in the context of marriage is the expected standard of human sexual activity," because we base that law on what the Holy Bible dictates, of course; and because of that, "public schools must stress sexual abstinence until marriage and may not provide instruction regarding family planning, contraception or disease risk-reduction methods."

    Can it get any worse than that? Of course it can! According to Indiana law, "state and local funds are only given to a sexual education program that 'has as its exclusive purpose teaching the social, psychological and health gains to be realized by abstaining from sexual activity; teaches abstinence from sexual activity outside marriage as the expected standard; teaches that abstinence from sexual activity is the only certain way to avoid out-of-wedlock pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases and other associated health problems; teaches that a mutually faithful monogamous relationship in context of marriage is the expected standard of human sexual activity; teaches that sexual activity outside of the context of marriage is likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects; teaches that bearing children out-of-wedlock is likely to have harmful consequences for the child, the child’s parents and society.'"
  • Any two adults living together in a sexual relationship are "living in sin." "A bill was introduced in the state Legislature last month for an act to amend the Indiana code concerning family and juvenile law to read as follows: 'Marriage is preferred, encouraged, and supported over any other domestic relationship.'" And that means "couples choosing to “live in sin” will be legally barred from receiving benefits married couples receive." In our neighboring state of Ohio "a motion has already been introduced by a public defender to dismiss domestic violence charges against defendants who are not legally married to their accusers."
  • Having children out of wedlock should be illegal. We recently went through a state senator trying to make marriage a requirement for motherhood. Now, she's only seeking to legally require "establishing parentage within the court system for children born through assisted reproduction, gestational agreements, or surrogacy agreements."
  • Only one male and one female can be married. "You can be retarded. You can be first cousins. You can be 15 and still get married. But you can’t be gay."
  • A bad marriage is better than no marriage. Indiana is in the top 10 of all US states for having the highest divorce rate. To "solve" that, lawmakers are working to get rid of the currently permissible "no-fault" divorce. In other words, it's a damn good thing that I was divorced from no-good partner long ago, or perhaps I would've been encouraging him to cheat on me so I could then leave his ass. Soon, "marriage counseling would have to precede the Covenant Marriage and only a few actions on the part of the couple could break the contract, such as adultery."
  • Abortion should be illegal in any instance except in cases threatening the very life of the pregnant woman. "Indiana lawmakers have been bragging... that they have a plan to make abortion illegal in the state of Indiana and open the door to overturn Roe v. Wade around the country."
  • Indiana teachers should be criminally charged for providing facts about abortion or marriage. It'll soon be introduced in the form of a "preference for marriage" bill stating that instructors cannot instruct on anything contrary to state law... even if our very laws are based on fiction, personal and political vendettas, and conservative opinions rather than facts.
  • Homosexuals are less than human. Indiana "assembly is now considering a state law that would overturn city and local ordinances prohibiting discrimination against homosexuals in employment, housing or education."

I've got just one thing left to say. It's time to get the hell out of Dodge. My partner and I are not contributing one more cent of our hard-earned money to the state of Indiana and funding this ignorant and severely detrimental way of thinking. In fact, maybe we'll set up a refuge for midwesterners in some part of the world in the future. And we'll have orgies every day powered by lots and lots of battery-operated objects.

homegrown video home grown amateur hardcore fucking toys sex girls women sexy pretty naked nude tits boobs

Comments
Add New
Anonymous 2009-12-03 18:12
StripGoddess 02/25/2006 01:10 AM
I agree with you, babe! I haver written extensively on my blog and in other venues about the real agenda beyond the overturning of Roe v. Wade that the Puritans are pursuing. They want to ban all non-procreative sex at any cost, and are using a wide array of tools to make it happen. I truly hope that people wake up and smell teh coffee before it is too late.

Tara, your Coffee-Smelling WebMistress 02/25/2006 05:22 PM
I doubt either of us mind being the ones to tote the coffee and position it right under their noses! ;)

michael g.b. 02/26/2006 08:30 PM
where is the ACLU when they're needed? . . . individual rights "precede" those of "the state" . . in fact, the ONLY rights the state has are those which have been ceded to the state by the consent of "the goverened" . . . the state has no business telling individuals what they can or cannot do in their "god given right" to life . . . liberty . . and the pursuit of happiness (the pursuit of "their happiness" not the "happiness of the styate or of state office holders".) it is sad to see how numbed the american public is becoming to the encroachment of the state into the control of their existences and lives . . . the camel's nose is now under the tent . . . soon the camel's ass will be inside the tent and the rest of the camel with it . . . and there will be no room in the tent for the individual person. that government governs best which governs least. p.s. even if one is a believer in God: sex is a divine given right . . not a privilege granted by "the state".

Tara, your Freedom-Loving WebMistress 02/26/2006 09:16 PM
Michael, as usual, I couldn't have said it better myself! Now, when will you be telling us about your own blog for us to follow? ;)

michael g.b. 02/27/2006 01:31 AM
Tara . . i'm way to lazy to start a blog . . . one of the "fatal flaws" in my character (not the ONLY one) is that i'm dow...
Write comment
Name:
Email:
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
 

3.23 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
< Prev   Next >